A Canadian hunter is lucky to be alive after being attacked by a black bear.
Richard Wesley was bow hunting near Fire River, Ontario, where reference is find a large black tolerate prowling adjacent. At first, the tolerate seemed unfazed by Wesley’s presence, but when the hunter makes a sound in an attempt to scare off the approaching tolerate, it charges.
Wesley attempts to make as much interference as possible, and even punches the attacking tolerate in the look. The camera falls and the hunter restores time a few seconds later, visibly shook by the near fatality experience.
“I should have photographed a very long time ago, ” Wesley pronounces into the camera time seconds after the attack.
Luckily, the hunter walked away roughly unscathed.
“No weaves except a bruised shoulder and pride where the tolerate threw me down, ” Wesley wrote on YouTube. “Genuinely glad that this was a non lethal or dreadful outcome.”
Using your paw to swipe right on the endless selections offered by Tinder can be < em> spending .
Thank goodness, relief is nows … thanks to a twitch spinner? Yes, that’s claim. Person has figured out how to employ one of the now ubiquitous gadgets to do the job for you. It’s pretty simple, truly. You simply levitate the spinner over your screen and make the swiping begin.
It was created by Holden Ellis, a 22 -year old from Virginia, who said he was inspired the working day while accepted on Tinder and “chewing on the spinner.” He decided to see what happened, and it turns out the silicone reacted with his telephone. Voila! The hack was born.
Fidget spinners are all the rage theyve been the subject of innumerable dog videos, a hip-hop psalm, and even nail prowes. So its not surprising that theyre making their path into our dating lives. Still, while it’s ultra efficient, this kind of firehose approaching to locating love is merely so useful. Theres truly good-for-nothing like being swiped by a twitch spinner to make a girl experience special.
Still, these gadgets are supposed to be all about stress relief, so do bear in mind if dating apps have got you down, this same joke can also be used to do a massive swipe left.
We all know by now that the number one thing you can do in life to fuck up your bark is fail to take off your makeup suitably. That and like , not imbibe so much better alcohol, but only one of those options is truly viable for the average betchs modern life-style. Unfortunately for those of us who usually come home some compounding of tired/ stoned and are generally sleepy, there are a lot of steps to actually taking your makeup off that exit highway beyond soap and liquid. Like, apparently Q-Tips should be involved? Im candidly scandalized. Too I incessantly fail to understand the presence of cucumbers in our allure regimens. I entail, I dont detest it, I time dont understand it. Which is most events in life, I guess.
While we all hope to come home after drudgery and entirely remove every trace of grunge from our holes and exhaustively exfoliate our post-workday bark, we all know that this daydream is basically bullshit. In reality you are able to most likely stumble residence at the end of the night, splash liquid on your aspect, and walk out of the shower with the working day mascara still perfectly applied to your slams.
In order to illustrate this phenomenon, check out Betches Video’s recent “How To Make Off Your Makeup Expectations Vs. Reality” video and is just like, “omg this is me.” Subscribe to our Youtube channel for more funny videos just like this one.
We were never going to get an animated Jon Stewart.
It’s been said that the insane news cycle killed Jon Stewart’s daily animated news show, but the truth is, the hitch was as much about the animation as it was the news.
“We all thought the project had great potential but there were technical issues in terms of production and distribution that proved too difficult given the quick turnaround and topical nature of the material,” said HBO and Stewart in a statement to Mashable.
It’s a shame, really, because the animation technology they were originally going to use was specifically designed to handle the ultra-fast turnaround required for daily-news-infused animation.
I know this because one of the animation companies behind Stewart’s big idea gave me a preview months ago, long before Donald Trump took office and the daily news cycle became By-the-Minute News Cycle.
Excited as everyone was about the prospect of a new Jon Stewart news satire show, Stewarts familiar face was notably absent from the concept. In his place and that of any other actors appearing on the show were supposed to be a set of rather unusual animated characters.
What I glimpsed late last year was a concept, an idea that the Otoyo, HBO and, apparently, Stewart, liked at least for a little while.
Animated shows are nothing new, but generating animations for what could be multiple segments in a daily news-based show is something else altogether. Even using traditional 3D animation tools like Maya, the process is time-consuming and intense. Theres the character creation, digital lighting and, most important, rigging. Rigging is akin to a puppeteer attaching strings and sticks to a physical puppet and then using them to move the character in time with voice recording (most animators record the voices before moving on to animation).
All of that would’ve taken too long for Stewarts HBO show, which never officially had a name.
When HBO announced the cable news parody show last summer, it also said that Stewart was building out an animation studio. Stewart, in turn, would be working with the graphics firm Otoy. What Stewart was building was described as simple animation, but beyond that we knew little about how he and HBO would do topical animation on a near daily basis.
Now it appears that the puzzle was never entirely solved. What I glimpsed late last year was a concept, an idea that the Otoyo, HBO and, apparently, Stewart, liked at least for a little while.
Sources now tell me that the team soon changed technologies.
Still, what I saw was intriguing and might be instructive for those hoping to do near-real time 3D animation shows.
It started with a cat
When John C Martin II and I sat down last fall in the back corner of a Union Square Starbucks, Martin, who serves as VP of Marketing for animation software company Reallusion, was anxious to show me what he hoped would become the magic behind Stewart’s HBO animation project.
Martin and I met two-and-a-half years ago on the floor of New York Comic Con. He had a tiny booth against one wall and was running a piece of software called CrazyTalk Animator that let me use my own voice to animate a photo-realistic cat. I spoke into a microphone and the on-screen gray tabby simultaneously kept pace. The cats head and eyes moved smoothly, if a bit awkwardly and out of his mouth came my words, my voice. I posted a Vine (RIP) to commemorate the moment.
That software and technology led to the development of several much more powerful applications, including iClone and Character Creator (which is part of the iClone suite). Like the mobile application I saw at Comic Con, this Windows-based application lets anyone, regardless of animations skills, manipulate and animate semi-realistic-looking 3D characters with relative ease.
Throughout our meeting. Martin never mentioned Jon Stewart by name. Were in the super-secret bunker of this show, Martin told me.
However, he described in detail the show HBO and Stewart (beyond the statement above, HBO never offered detailed comment to me on the show or the technology behind it), were building. It was supposed to be a topical news show, Martin told me, where the team picks up a news story in the afternoon, the writing team creates a script and the animation is produced within 24 hours.
The backbone of it is really on characters created in and tools from our real-time character generator, said Martin. And those characters and ideas all live inside the head of the man at the head of this show, he added.
Martin opened his 17-inch gaming laptop. On screen is a 3D, animated character called Buck. He was large with exaggerated features. Martin calls him hyper realistic, which I take to mean, real-ish, but with a hard-push into parody. Buck might have served as Stewart’s show host.
The software applies what appear to be traditional clay sculpture techniques to build virtually any character out of a handful of base figures (male and female of varying ethnicities and body types) and attributes relating to hair, eye color and accessories like glasses. Its a universal mesh thats highly morphable, said Martin.
He showed me how he could use the mouse to select any portion of the face or body, grabbing the nose and pulling it out, moving the eyes, expanding the cheekbones. It seemed like everything could move freely, but there were some rules and limits so that the figure still animated in a human way.
One of the reasons this works so well is that these characters are not just Stretch Armstrong figures, plastic sacks full of morphable liquid. The eyes, teeth, full bones all there the underlying mechanics are all set, said Martin.
To demonstrate just how morphable each one of iClone Character Creators characters are, Martin showed me an animated version of myself. It was generated out of the same base character as Bart. In other words, Bart and my animated avatar have the same digital DNA.
All this morphing capability combined with a motion-capture-based facial-puppeteering engine could’ve made it possible for the Stewarts team to, as I did with that cat two years ago, talk and have the characters follow and act out their speech in real-time.
This was not Reallusions first brush with TV comedy. In 2014, the company helped light night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel prank his Aunt Chippy, quickly created a fake sonogram video that showed a still-in-the-womb baby clapping, flipping Chippy the bird and even doing jumping jacks.
I spent a little time playing with the software. Its not quite as simple as Martin described, but I was impressed with its unusual combination of power and ease of use. Having worked with more complicated animation products in the past, I could see how iClone Character Creator could save animators days, if not weeks of production, and at $99 a seat, could also save money.
It looks like just the kind of fast-turn-around 3D animation software HBO and Stewart would have needed to power daily, satiric news animations. Even if this software wasn’t the final solution, HBO and Stewart were still on track as of January, when HBO told me that it was preparing to launch the show within the first half of 2017. They were even planning a New York press conference. Reallusion would not comment on the demise of the project.
In the end, Trump’s surreal Presidency proved even too much for software that makes a business out of quickly creating exaggerated reality.
As for Jon Stewart’s and HBO, they’re still planning projects. No word on if any of them will be animated.
WhenFifty Shades of Greycaught fire in 2011, manypointed to e-readers like the Amazon Kindle.Self-conscious housewiveswere more apt to enjoyerotica because no one could gues the book by its consider, the presumption started. This would bode well for podcasts.
Twenty-four percent of Americans — 67 million people–listened to a podcast in February. That’s up from 17 percent in 2015. Over the last two years, monthly podcast listening has grown by 40 percent, with a proliferation arch that appears to be steadily parted upward. And many of these new listeners are determining podcasts through a groundswell of bizarre, niche topics.
There are now podcasts dedicated tocolon cancer professionalsandfly anglers, which is well and good, particularly for the loner fly angler in your family.This listening phenomenon might be even more important for once-taboo or ignored societies, likeblack culture, people interested intransgender liberties, and evenprisoners. And in the demagogue age of PresidentDonald Trump, political podcasts–either for or againstthe commander-in-chief–have come of age, albeit with a few loud talking heads offering periphery conspiracies.
Once youve removed the shame from eating certain media in public, parties may make all sorts of various types of decisions that feed coarser, or at the least darker, desires.Its a merriment theory–butit’s missing “the worlds biggest” picture.
Podcastsarent going to lead to a commonwealth ofGreylisteners on the bus. Yes, parties are selecting weirder, hyper-specific topics.( The Adventure Zone, a display where three brothers and their papa playDungeons and DragonsoverSkype, has only one gathering in the hundreds of thousands .) But that’s because podcasts are entertainment’s great equalizer.
Manyindependent podcasts dont will vary depending on ad receipt to hold their evidences, andthe barriers to starting a podcast are financially low-grade: You can host it for free on sites like SoundCloud, annal free audio on Skype, even licence free music from composers via imaginative commons.Unlike institutional media firms, podcasters can speak directly to their listeners with no constraints.
As a podcast farmerand buyer, Ive been trying to tackle the idea of how to provide information to parties when they dont know they miss or need it. Its no secret that, in 2017, hasten and culture percolate every exchange. Podcasting is very similar. There ismeasurable indicatethat podcasting is still a majoritywhite, maleindustry, and there have been veryrecentmovementstrying to address this. But theres likewise no denying that podcasting, as an industry, and as a subset of the internet, is makingconsequential advancesin the fight to move messaging forward for these under-represented voices.
Guys We Fuckedis an independent slapstick podcast where Corinne Fisher and Krystyna Hutchinson draw clients on to discuss their sexuality lives, partially to draw these discussions to more parties. The evidences call is” the anti-slut-shaming podcast .” In recent escapades, the two hosts have interviewed non-binary writers, transgender humorists, and bisexual women of color.
People are interested in hearing about other saunters of life, but it just has to be very, very easy for those people to get it, Fisher tells the Daily Dot. People arent going to go to Harlem and sounds a speech on pitch-black culture. It would be nice if they did, but they’re not going to do it.
Fishersaysthat because those thoughts areaccessible from their living room, just by searching their telephones, they’remore willing to listen. As suchGuys We Fuckednets more than 1.2 million listens a month, according to Fisher.
I try to use my pulpit got to make sure not to just have white dudes on, Fishersays. I try to find these people who have these different outlooks or different experiences.
Fisher and Hutchinson are taking a passage in real season through listener emails, social media, and through conversations with clients. They’re discovering that their oaths have necessitate and parties are listening to them — discovering doesnt seem so lonely when you know the lessons are shared.
Forget stripping yourself. Feeing menu is 2017’s hottest brand-new feminist fad.
At least according to Special K, whose recent campaign, “Own it, ” tries so, so difficult to make a bold political statement: that women like to eat.
Maybe it’s exactly me, but I ever thought that women had to eat to survive. Huh.
Either way, it sounds the Special K made their cue from a decade of tampon commercials where women show that they can “do it all.” That “all” includes: jogging, listening to rap music, more jogging, going to work with a tampon in, and devouring diet cereal.
Watch and have a chuckle, all while devouring a sensible snack.
The White House wants unmitigated ability to captivate your drones.
The Trump administration is asking members of Congress to consider legislation that would allow officials to do whatever the f* ck they want to any hum they see a threat to a “covered facility, ” according to a document published by The New York Times .
That means they can obliterate the dronings out of the sky, captivate them, make them apart, hack them, whatever.
The proposed amendments mentions safeguarding privacy and civil liberties several times, but also says “covered persons” can’t be subject to any type of legal action that results in a captured, tracked, or destroyed drone.
Terms are also left sketchy in the 10 -page document. A “covered facility” is something that would be decided at a later date, and “covered person” applies to federal agents and members of the army, but the wording stirs it vast enough to seemingly cover police as well.
“The term ‘covered person’ necessitates any member of the Armed Army, a Federal officer, employee, agent, or contractor, or any other individual that is designated by the heads of state of a department or agency … ” both documents says.
The administration answers it’s am worried that dronings can see and carry missiles, and wants the power to stop any hum before the skies are fitted with them.
So, if the legislation proceeds and you quality your hum, keep an eye out for federal agents.
Workers at Elon Musk’s sustainable automaker suffered 8.8 injuries per 100 employees in 2015 31 percent more than their peers at other factories.
The numbers are even worse for serious injuries at Tesla’s Fremont plant, the focal point of its labor issues. Serious injuries that result in days away from work, restricted duty, or job transfer occurred at that plant at double the industry rate in 2015, with 7.9 per 100 compared to the industry average 3.9.
The report, by the workplace safety organization Worksafe and based on safety logs requested by Tesla workers, came out the same day BuzzFeed reported that Tesla’s head of human resources, Arnnon Geshuri, would leave the company. As HR chief, Geshuri in part oversaw the working conditions that have been seen as unsafe.
The reason we asked for Teslas safety log is simple. We see people getting injured in the plant on a regular basispeople who do the same sorts of jobs that we do, Jonathan Galescu, a Tesla body repair technician, said in Worksafe’s report. We want to knowin fact, we need to knowthe facts about how often workers are getting injured, and how those injuries are happening. It took us several attempts just to get management to give us the information theyre required by law to provide. It shouldnt have to be that way. Workers shouldnt have to risk retaliation just to learn more about safety in the workplace.
Worksafe’s report arrives after Tesla told The Guardianthat its injury rates had declined in the first quarter of 2017. In that same report, workers recounted how they worked long hours under intense pressure to meet Musk’s extreme goals. One worker described seeing a fellow employee pass out and “smash their face open” on the floor. Musk himself used to sleep on the factory floor to encourage workers to meet his benchmarks.
“We may have had some challenges in the past as we were learning how to become a car company, but what matters is the future and with the changes weve made, we now have the lowest injury rate in the industry by far. Our goal is to have as close to zero injuries as humanly possible and to become the safest factory in the auto industry,” a Tesla spokesperson said in response to the report.
Worksafe determined that those 2017 numbers were too preliminary to suggest meaningful change in Tesla’s working conditions.
Instead, the group found that injuries at Tesla continue to far outpace injuries at automakers nationwide. In 2016, Tesla’s 8.8 injuries per 100 employees rate from 2015 declined to 8.1 still far above the industry standard.
Will we ever actually buy that is something that trash through our smartphones? And does it even matter?
The answer seems to depend on who you ask.
By some orders, emergence in how much people buy through their smartphones is lagging estimations and still underwhelms when compared to desktop; others see it as making transformative milestones that herald a new age of mobile preeminence. Still more say the dichotomy between the two is greater even relevant.
“Mobile is a player in this whole digital world-wide … but we can no longer think of it in isolation, ” supposes Gartner mobile industry adviser Gene Alvarez. “It’s actually laying a organization for other types of customer experience.”
Despite the sweeping rise of mobile on nearly every other segment of the web, online patronizing was still of the stubborn few areas where people still principally prefer their laptops or checks to their telephones or tablets.
The conventional wisdom has held that consumers oftentimes browse and research items on the small screens but turn to a computer when they actually pull the trigger on a purchase.
Yet at the same term, mobile’s share of retail sales has been growing at a speedy clip for years. And industry pundits have long contemplated a mobile industry revolt in which smartphone store would become the new normal.
None of these makes were undoubtedly inaccurate. Mobile patronizing did indeed outpace desktop auctions in emergence throughout the array of the above timeline and have continued do so.
But as the share of overall mobile commerce swelled at an average yearly tempo of virtually 7 percent in the last half-decade, mobile store clocked less than half that rate at 2.7 percent, according to data from Statcounter and Comscore respectively.
Consumers clearly weren’t as hungry to start patronizing on their smartphones as they were to do happenings like download activities, browse the web, or berth on social media.
Surveys often chalk this reluctance up to the constraints of small screens, cluttered and clunky store locates that don’t restate well to telephones, and payment defence worries.
But the sales emergence metric alone doesn’t tell the whole story. In other respects, mobile store is actually marring desktop. Two thirds of retail site or app commerce now comes from mobile, Comscore supposes, although there are purchasers are less than half as likely to buy something there.
The total number of deals conducted on mobile also recently passed up desktop with a whopping two-thirds share, according to a report from Criteo last come. Yet desktop is still king in total spend.
‘Not all things are sold equally’
Rates of mobile help vary widely across different types of products.
As you might expect, people are much more cozy buying smaller, less expensive items on their telephones than “they il be”, announce, a piece of furniture.
“Not all things are sold equally, ” Alvarez supposes. “I will buy something that is easily outlined and communicated to me on a mobile devicea volume, a vocal, a video gamethese are all very comfortable on mobile because I don’t need a lot of information.
“A living room rectified is a entire different narration, ” he added.
Indeed, mobile sales of video games, consoles, and supplementaries; toy and pastime makes; and jewelry have already passed up those on desktop, per Comscore’s latest data. Music and movies, blooms and greeting placards, and incident tickets are all nearing an even split.
Those imbalances are reflected in a legion of niche mobile-centric startups that have challenged legacy competitors in those smartphone-friendly categories.
Second-hand marketplace LetGo, for example, is taking on Craigslist’s trademark hodgepodge site with a slick app that feels is a messaging platform than an online accumulation. The platform, which traffics mainly in tiny personal and household wares , now boasts a monthly active user basi of around 20 million with approximately one quarter of Craigslist’s monthly visitor-ship.
Meanwhile, online diamond vendor JamesAllen.com conjured $140 million last month on the strength of its 360 -degree gallery-like display interface. CEO Dean Lederman said the company has tripled in immensity in the past two years with a millennial-heavy mobile audience.
“You can see the figure, color, and trim online the same way you can in a storein some ways better, ” Lederman said.
While mobile garment auctions still exclusively account for a bit over a fifth of the category’s auctions, way apps like Springtime and Gilt are taking advantage of a general paucity of smartphone savvy among conventional robing outlets with Instagram-like visual layouts.
Mobile retail platform Newstore recently analyzed the mobile patronizing events of more than 100 legacy retail brands like Nike, DKNY, and Calvin Klein and apportioned each a tier. The median came out to a “C-.”
“While purchasers are living in a mobile-first world-wide, the retail industry clasps perilously to the past, ” investigates wrote. “Most brandseven those with celebrated honours for comfortable in-store experiencesare behind on the technology support curve.”
Despite the seeming capability in the mobile retail grocery, emergence will always be fundamentally capped by the physical aspects of phone screens. Even the most transformational technology would be hard-pressed to overcome the cramped flaunt seat for big-ticket items.
Screens of all sizes
At the end of the day, the lesson countless forward-thinking retailers are taking from this mixed bag of trends is that, at any particular top, patronizing shouldn’t be seen as a purely mobile or desktop act but instead as its own experience that seamlessly embraces all devices.
“Instead of thinking that one channel’s going to wipe out the other, ” Alvarez answered, “sellers need to be aware that the store knowledge has been deconstructed by the consumer and customer technology, and we have to enable[ purchasers] to reconstruct it nonetheless they might want.”
Such a organization could conceivably include not only desktop and mobile but also web-enabled internet-of-things maneuvers and tech-outfitted physical stores.
“So I might be comfortable seeking laundry cleanser from my mobile phone, but I may also cause my internet-connected washing machine fiat me replenishment laundry cleanser because I rely it, ” Alvarez prolonged. “And my mobile phone might tell me about it and let me approve it.”
It would require careful tracking of users across their numerous programmes, device-specific interfaces designed to complement their copies, and a firm clasp of customer behavior endure through mass data collection.
These are the types of deliberations stores will face as they continue to push into the mobile frontier.
As the weather heats up, were drawn to brighter complexions and lighter fibers cue your desire for a complete wardrobe refresh. It’s alluring to invest in an entirely new wardrobe to match the developing season, but pattern can come with a sizable premium both for your pocketbook and the environment. Did you know that it can take up to 1, 800 gallons of water to make a single duet of jeans? 1,800 gallons!
This year, instead of heading straight-from-the-shoulder for the mall or diving into the abyss that is online browse, consider checking out your regional thrift accumulate for all your summer fun wants from poolside lounging to graduation defendants or weds. Thrifting can be a great way to save money( and countries around the world) while prepping for summer.
Like anything, thrifting can be an skill. We’re here with some gratuities and maneuvers to help you get your thrift on the summer months.
Before you go:
1. Grab clothing and supplements from your own wardrobe that you no longer necessity and are ready to recycle. Make room for those brand-new pinpoints and bequeath to regional humanitarian arrangements while you’re at it.
2. Get on the mailing list or attach the store’s loyalty platform. Research what daytimes have agreements for certain components up to 50% off, or buy one get one free. You might even be able to get a discount on your birthday.
3. Position a fund. It’ll help you stay focused on items you actually involved. Even a small budget can get you quite a haul at accumulates like Savers, where roughly 95% of its consideration of this agenda item sold are under $10.
4. Deliver a sidekick. You’ll cover more dirt in the accumulate and have someone there to take decisions on your more distinct finds.
A post shared by Savers Thrift Store (@ savers_thrift) on
15. Even if you aren’t a skill expert, you can probably sew a button back on, hem a dress, or cut out some shoulder pads. Or you are able to visit your regional tailor.
16. Glancing for jorts( jean short-liveds) the summer months? Find a duet of jeans with a little bit more room in the thigh, cut off the legs, and wheel the hems for some immediate, super-comfy brand-new shorts.
Shopping for knickknacks and housewares:
17. Check out the housewares section for seasonal party emblems. Lemonade pitchers, margarita glasses, and holiday meals galore.
18. Maintain an gaze out for gardening affords it’s never too late in the summer season to weed some flowers.
19. In bibles, you’ll find enormous speaks for your next beach vacation, including current excellent – selling paperback story. Why waste full premium?
20. Recipe bibles very. Nothing defeats browsing through a hard copy of “Grilling for Dummies” or “5 0 Easy Frozen Yogurt Recipes.”
21. Glancing for a full set of meals? You’ll find matching platefuls, cups, bowls, and more in any thrift shop.
22. Maintain an gaze out for cast iron goes with really a bit passion, even goes that look pretty beat up can be good as new.
23. The kitchen device section might surprise you cake-pop producers, cordless wine-coloured chillers, donut producers, milk frothers, juicers, and so much more.
Before you check out:
24. Look for the purposes of an shop( or ask an employee) to research your brand-new device before you buy it.
25. Didn’t find what you were looking for? Try again tomorrow earnestly. Thrift shops like Savers put out up to 10,000 brand-new components at each accumulate every day.
A post shared by Savers Thrift Store (@ savers_thrift) on
26. Or try thrifting in a brand-new neighborhood. Each accumulate is unique, so it’s importance trying the site on the other side of municipality or wherever you happen to be vacationing.
27. Have fun. It’s a no-brainer, but its significant reminder.
Thrifting is a win-win-win for your pocketbook, the Earth, and their own communities.
According to the Savers 2017 State of Reuse Report, over 6 in ten parties said they shopped thrift in 2016. As more parties choose a thrifted tee instead of a brand-new one, over time, this can help reduce rich squander like millions of gallons of water to originate that brand-new tee or a duet of jeans.