Tag: uber

Meet UberMan, the mascot for Uber from 2010

Meet your new favorite superhero.

This isn’t your next Marvel feature film, but lover, this is a good movie, I symbolize, ad. Now we have UberMan, and he wants to “save San Francisco from the incredible distractive and awkward transportation system.”

Ride-hailing giant Uber is having a rough, rough, rough time in so far. But luckily this small pearl of a video was surfaced thanks to some dedicated reporters( h/ t Harry McCracken ).

Oh how far you’ve come, Uber. Check out Uber’s old YouTube Channel for some other gems, like CEO Travis Kalanick alleging, “A really big thank you to the SF MTA for really allowing us to raising huge busines to a city that really needs it.”

Kalanick UberMan is out to “save San Fran, ” according to the YouTube description. Wait, don’t you symbolize SF?

If You’ve Ever Deleted Uber Off Your Phone, There’s Something You Should Know

If youve ever removed an app off your iPhone, you were probably for the purposes of the mark every section of data related tothat lotion was obliterated from your device.

Apparently, that wasnt the client with Uber.

Based off a new report in the New York Times, Uber secretly tracked consumers after they removed the app from their telephones and Apple was pissed.

Toby Melville/ Reuters

Apparently, Uber onceused a tool announced fingerprinting tokeep an eye on telephones that invested the application.

By doing this, they were also able to keep track of users who removed the app from the fingerprints left on their devices.

So, mostly, Uber knew exactly who was using the app on their telephones who once removed it. Thats comforting, right?

The company claimedthey used fingerprinting toto prevent sham pleasure, because it has enabled them determine whether or not a telephone that are currently downloaded Uber was wrongfully re-installing it.

Needless to say, the hoax spoof was against Apples privacy guidelines and Tim Cook wasnt exhilarated about the news.

For those of you who arent informed, Tim Cook is the CEO of Apple. Hes a big deal.

When he found out about Ubers privacy violation in 2015, he put a meeting withTravis Kalanick the Chief executive of Uber and addressed the issue.

Im telling you, this person doesnt mess around.

Apparently, Cook addressed Kalanick and pronounced, So, Ive heard youve been violating some of our rules, and threatened to kick Uber off the App store.



Since Cook addressed the privacy violation, Uber changed their fingerprinting tricks to comply with Apples regulations.

To clear the air, an Uber spokesperson talked talked to The Verge, and pronounced,

We utterly do not track individual consumers or their locating if theyve removed the app. As the New York Times story notes towards the very end, this is a typical channel to prevent fraudsters from lading Uber onto a stolen telephone, putting in a stolen charge card, taking an expensive ride and then erasing the phoneover and over again.

Similar procedures are also be useful for notice and impeding suspicious logins to shield our consumers accountings. Being able to recognize known bad actors when they try to get back onto our network is an important security measure for both Uber and our users.

Well, thats comforting I guess?

Either way, were happy Uber isnt keeping track of our whereabouts without our consent.

Thanks for having our backs, Tim.

Uber’s secret Hell program violated drivers’ privacy, class-action suit claims

Uber allegedly exerted program to road and determine Lyft moves, to be built sketches of individuals and figuring out who was driving for Uber and Lyft

Uber fronted yet another challenge on Monday when a former Lyft move filed a class-action lawsuit alleging that trade secrets program established by the ride-hailing giant to spy on its rivals moves contravened federal and country privacy laws.

The program, known internally as Hell, was disclosed on 12 April by the tech news site the Information. Uber allegedly exerted the program to road and determine Lyft moves, to be built sketches of individuals and figuring out who was driving for Uber and Lyft. Uber then prioritized referring goes to moves who exerted both apps, hoping to persuade moves to abandon Lyft, according to the paper.

Uber feuded the charge of giving preference to moves exploiting both services in a comment to the Knowledge but does not observation further on the program.

The lawsuit, being submitted by Michael Gonzalez, who drove for Lyft from 2012 until November 2014, asserts that in using Hell, Uber engaged in illegitimate intrusion of privacy and interception of electronic communications and personas.

The program shattered Lyft moves, the dres disagrees, by reducing the total number of moves on the pulpit, thereby inhibiting Lyft from offering inexpensive and immediate rides.

The complaint quotes the 2012 supreme court case United States v Jones, which found that Americans have constitutional defences against GPS tracking by law enforcement.

Uber did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit.

Mondays lawsuit is the latest in a slew of bad news for Uber. In recent weeks, the New York Times has disclosed two other questionable features of the Uber app.

After the Times reported on Greyball, trade secrets program to circumvent law enforcement, the company discontinued the aspect. On Sunday, the Times reported that Uber had violated Apples privacy conventions for iOS apps, ensuing in a private castigation from Tim Cook.

Uber has also been rocked by a viral #DeleteUber campaign, allegations regarding widespread unprofessional behavior and gender discrimination, the departure of a raft of top executives, and a major legal battle with Google spinoff Waymo.

Tech CEOs are becoming more like politicians, so they should be judged the same way

Tech CEOs act like politicians. Let's treat them as such.

Last week, Dennis Mitzner, an Israeli tech journalist, published a blog post on his website claiming an overemphasis on social justice had “contaminated” tech journalism.

He grumbled about how a press visit to a Nokia factory had, in his mind, been derailed. Instead of focusing on the company’s plans to build a commercial 5G network, the group of journalists fretted over Nokia’s diversity policy.

Mitzner used the example to support a flimsy thesis that journalists overemphasize “hiring policies and aspects that relate to social justice issues at the expense of judging the technology and its impact on society and economy.”

He failed to realize the reason so many tech journalists focus on social issues is that tech companies themselves have done the same. Tech executives are increasingly wielding power once reserved for elected officials, so tech journalists have begun to scrutinize them in ways they have historically judged administrations.

Tech executives are increasingly wielding power once reserved for elected officials.

Questioning whether a tech company’s staff is inclusive is becoming the same as asking whether a president’s cabinet is.

For more than a decade, corporations like Facebook and Google have not only grown wildly wealthy, but they’ve explicitly claimed they had higher callings beyond bringing in lucrative returns for investors.

They promised that living in a technologically advanced society of their creation would make our lives better, including for historically marginalized groups.

Tech in the age of Trump

In the wake of Donald Trump’s election, these companies (and the considerable lobbying power they employ) are finding there’s a newfound pressure on them to deliver on the moral promises they’ve made.

They’ve begun to come out against policies put forward by the Trump administration, like the recent travel ban on predominantly Muslim countries. On Tuesday, Facebook announced employees would be free to take time off to protest on International Women’s Day next month.

They’ve also faced post-election backlash on issues like hate speech and fake news, which they’ve finally begun to develop tools to combat. Large tech companies have started to do things that feel like the work of governments.

Deciding whether a user should be banned, for example, looks like a decision lawmakers make about who should be allowed in their country. The way that a corporation like Facebook responds to its users resembles how a congressman might respond to the concerns of her constituents.

Former president Obama gives another equally powerful man, Mark Zuckerberg, a hug.

Image: justin sullivan/getty images

In this sense, immensely powerful figures like Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Travis Kalanick of Uber, and Brian Chesky of Airbnb have taken on the kind of moral responsibility once reserved for politicians. They view their platforms the same way lawmakers see their policies.

But don’t take my word for it. Listen to Chesky himself, who recently told Forbes India, “When we design our community, we think like politicians legislating for their constituents.”

Uber has argued that it doesn’t just run a business; it provides a critical public service. By eventually removing large numbers of cars from the road, Uber says, it will help reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, lessening the effects of climate change.

Facebook in particular has ramped up its virtue signaling. More than ever, the social network is concerned about how its users perceive it.

As BuzzFeed‘s Nitasha Tiku’s eloquently explained, Zuckerberg has become increasingly interested in ensuring that he is viewed favorably as a leader so much so that journalists have wondered whether he’s seeking election to public office.

“It is our responsibility to amplify the good effects and mitigate the bad to continue increasing diversity while strengthening our common understanding so our community can create the greatest positive impact on the world,” Mark Zuckerberg wrote in his February manifesto, which resembled in parts a political platform.

The empire of the Valley

In a page out of science fiction, a number of leaders in tech have reportedly even banded together to form their own constitution. Sam Altman, president of famed startup accelerator Y Combinator, said he’s spoken to a group of tech leaders about creating a set of beliefs they all support.

That makes sense, since tech companies have often found traditional governments to be in the way of their goals. Both Uber and Airbnb have fought local and federal governments to ensure their businesses remain as unregulated as possible.

Journalists often discover that tech companies fail to practice what they preach.

Tech firms don’t want to avoid government regulation only so they can continue to rake in piles of cash. They also want to bypass regulations so they can be free to create a society the way they envision it.

Ultimately, they want to convince consumers that for-profit companies can be dominant forces for good in the world, perhaps even more so than governments. Naturally, tech journalists have taken to examining the truth behind such an assertion. Journalists often discover that tech companies fail to practice what they preach.

Earlier this month Google claimed it had “closed the gender pay gap globally.” Less than a week later, the Department of Labor said Google had fostered an “extreme” gender pay gap across its entire workforce.

It can seem like tech journalists cover social issues disproportionately. In reality, they’re tasked not just with covering the products that these companies develop, but also how they shape global society.

Technology isn’t neutral. It’s well documented that algorithms and products can carry the same biases that people do.

It’s a journalist’s job to ask whether a product, a platform, or a piece of software really benefits everyone.

We live on these platforms the same way we live in a country. Tech journalists should criticize tech firms, and the people that run them, the same way they criticize governments and politicians.

WATCH: NASA has discovered a water world in our solar system capable of sustaining life

Uber’s long history with tipping (or not tipping)

Uber might finally have to give in on tip-off .

Image: adam berry/ Getty Images

What’s one trouble Uber has that’s simply the usual grade of upsetting, and not totally sickening? Tipping.

The ride-hailing monstrous has for years stood strong against telling purchasers tip their Uber drivers within the Uber app. Lyft started telling riders tip their moves in 2012, and Uber still hasn’t gotten on board. The issue has is an element of the stickiest for Uber’s fraught relations with its drivers.

Uber might finally be forced to change its motif after New York City’s Taxi and Limousine Commission introduced a proposition the coming week that would require ride-hailing companies operating in the city to give riders to tip their moves. The need to follow a rule like that in one of Uber’s biggest and most important markets could coerce the company to allow tip-off across the country or around the world.

Uber’s history with tipping has been around since its early days and goes all the way to the exceed. According to the New York Times , Uber CEO Travis Kalanick privately opposes tip-off. Kalanick apparently thinks that a tipping piece could obligate Uber somehow less plea or obligate people who don’t tip their moves feel guilty. A tipping tool for Uber is reportedly already built and ready to go, but hasn’t been introduced.

The lack of a tipping piece too points to the company’s broader question with its moves. Uber drivers are technically contractors , not works, signifying they work for themselves. For Uber, there’s only downside in including tip-off because it would obligate trip-up more expensive without any of that fund going to the company( unless it started taking a section …).

The issue was serious enough that it went to tribunal, where a major settlement Uber reached last year in a class-action dispute was put forward by moves nearly necessitated the company to move forward on tip-off by telling purchasers that their grubs didn’t include gratuity. But that colonization was subsequently rejected by a judge.

Not letting riders to tip their moves in-app contributed to the knowledge of Uber as the unfeeling, win-at-all-costs musician in ride-hailing, specially compared to Lyft, which transferred the milestone of $200 million awarded under tips-off in March. And of course there’s regular taxi taxi, which have allowed tip-off eternally. Equestrians can technically tip their Uber drivers with cash, but since they’re never paying for the razz with cash, it’s confusing.

We have not recognized project proposals and look forward to reviewing it, ” Uber said in a statement. “Uber is always striving to offer best available making opportunity for moves and we are constantly working to improve the driver suffer. Thats why, in New York City, we partnered with the Machinists Union to make sure current and future Uber NYC moves have a stronger utter and launched a series of brand-new implements and endorsement plans for drivers.

The Independent Drivers Guild lobbied for the New York proposal, which it guesses will lead to over $300 million per year in tips-off for New York drivers.

Todays decision is a vitally important step forward for moves. In-app tip-off will signify a create of billions of dollars for New York City moves each year, Independent Drivers Guild founder Jim Conigliaro Jr. said in a statement.

Lyft, for its part, claimed the moral high ground in this debate.

“We’ve always known that offering in-app tip-off is the right thing to do, which is why we’ve said and done since our earliest days. It’s a big reason why the great majority of moves wish Lyft, ” Lyft spokesman Adrian Durbin said.

While Uber formerly thrived on its epitome as the aggressive president in ride-hailing, the take-no-prisoners approach isn’t as plea anymore( a sexual harassment scandal and a video of your CEO criticizing an Uber driver will do that ).

The New York rule must be approved by the taxi commission’s committee before it takes effect, which could happen in July.

WATCH: This mini scuba gear simply leaved snorkeling a cool upgrade

Read more:

New Yorks Taxi commission to propose in-app tipping requirement for Uber

The New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission( TLC) will move forward with a proposal to require any automobile works that abide remittance alone via credit card to offer a tipping option via the same makes, the New York Times reported Monday. The recommendation seems designed predominantly to make Ubers handwriting, requiring the travel hailing work to offer an in-app tipping option, something its been reluctant to introduce thus far.

The TLCs announced recommendation is likely to be exactly an initial pace towards implementing the rule, and would still require formal opening sometime within the next few months, and then a public hearing lobbying feedback from members of the public, and then a referendum to decide whether to implement or reject the proposal.

The brand-new proposed brand-new govern meets after the Independent Drivers Guild( IDG ), a group that represents Uber moves in the city, put forward a petition and received over 11,000 signatures supporting the implementation of an in-app tipping option. Under the proposed rules, anyone alone admitting money would be able to continue admitting money tips-off and not required to offer a card-based tipping method.

IDG founder Jim Conigliaro, Jr. catered the next statement regarding the TLCs recommendation 😛 TAGEND

Todays decision is a vitally important step forward for moves. In-app tipping will convey a raise of hundreds of millions of dollars for New York City moves each year. Operators have long been denied access to the kinds of benefits and strive safeties countless laborers take for conceded, such as paid sick leave or the minimum wage. As a reaction, New York Citys professional moves have traditionally depended on perquisites for a substantial portion of their income. Cuts to driver pay across the ride-hail industry has drawn tipping income more important than ever,

Uber, when contacted, offering this remark via a spokesperson regarding the potential brand-new govern 😛 TAGEND

We have not watched the proposal and look forward to reviewing it. Uber is always striving to offer the best deserving the possibilities for moves and we are constantly working to improve the motorist knowledge. Thats why, in New York City, we partnered with the Machinists Union to make sure current and future Uber NYC moves have a stronger enunciate and launched a series of brand-new tools and reinforcement programmes for drivers.

Read more:

Uber whistleblower Susan Fowler will become EIC of her own publication

Susan Fowler is doing more than merely whistleblowing on Uber .

Image: Brittany Herbert/ Mashable

Susan Fowler became a household name in the tech nature when she published a blog announce in February delineating Uber’s record of discrimination, unprofessional behavior, and sexism.

Her blog post blew open the door to numerous fright floors about Uber from more and more women who worked there. Since then, Uber the scandal has continued to deepen( and nobody’s sure it has a bottom ).

But it’s been a gentle 2 month at least in public for Fowler. Now, she’s procreating her first major move since. Fowler will become editor-in-chief of Increment, a new booklet from Stripe. Fowler has been working for the payments tech fellowship virtually since she left Uber.

Increment will consider a collect of insider tips-off prepared from inside Silicon Valleys largest and most influential corporations and entrepreneurs. A much of that will be technological writing that explains how some of best available coders do their jobs, according to Recode .

The quarterly booklet throws Fowler back in the public eye. Until Thursday, Fowler hadn’t tweeted since Uber allegedly started investigating her. Now, she’s back on Twitter, feeing her new publication to the world.

The decision to join Stripe and extend Increment was a pretty easy one for me: It was an opportunity to be impactful, to collect and share best rehearsals from the best available engineering units in “the worlds”. Increment is a step toward dropping the distance between the Silicon Valley elite and makes everywhere, ” she said in a statement for Recode.

Be on the lookout for Increment and for more from Fowler besides the Uber drama.

WATCH: iPhone 8 rumors include a ‘Smart Connector’ for AR headset

Read more:

Teens can sneak out but not before Uber narcs on them

“Not cool, Mom. Not cool.”
Image: uber

Kids are not to be trusted. And now, thanks to Uber for teenages, they don’t have to be.

The scandal-plagued ride-hail companionship announced Thursday a brand-new platform granting mothers to add adolescents to a “family profile, ” thus granting plucky minors aged 13 to 17 capacities necessary to acclaim a auto all by their grownup souls. No adults required.

“We all wish we could be in several plazas at once, ” the saccharine ad facsimile without doubt channeling Uber CEO Travis Kalanick’s desire to simultaneously extinguish all of his company’s press barrages tells us. “But until then, Uber can help families with the logistics.”

Importantly for mothers who want to keep a close-fisted lockdown on their little imps, the privacy-challenged Uber offers to do more than exactly shuttle tweens home from little tournament: Uber will totally narc on your kids.

“With the guidance of child safety experts, were also causing mothers peace of mind with a simple way to substantiate the whereabouts of their teenages for up to 20 minutes after the move ends, ” the edict reads.

Hear that, little ones? When you get sagged off at the library “to study, ” but then sneak over to Tommy’s house to, well, not investigate , you’re totally busted.

Teen Uber is currently in the aviator phase and only available in Seattle, Columbus, and Phoenix, Arizona. Interestingly, it’s not the only happening the company is researching in Arizona. Uber self-driving gondolas are also on the road there after get booted out of San Francisco.

But don’t fret, annoyed parent education the Uberverse. No robot is going to pick up your baby( at the least has still not been ).

“[ Teens will] get travels from experienced moves who have received routinely high ratings from local communities of equestrians, ” the edict helpfully explains.

This is not the first child-chauffeuring jeopardize to have oozed its way out of the Bay Area # disruptors’ scene. The New York Times profiled a emcee of same renders last year publishing the portion literally one day before marquee musician Shuddle terminated enterprises due to an inability to raise money.

Uber, of course, has a lot more cash at its disposal and demonstrates how time and time again that it’s more than willing to set stacks of it on fire to establish market dominance. Their latest great efforts to angle the Richie Rich market should likewise be taken seriously something the sartorially provoked Loomer family of Uber’s press release looms delighted to be able to do.

But adolescents of the world, including the Loomer boys, should take note: Uber is not your best friend. Uber will totally narc you out. It’s a feature , not a bug.

WATCH: When your Uber driver exactly won’t stop talking