After a long, muddling, counterfeit news-filled 2016 ballot in which Donald Trump became President of the United States, Barack Obama was one of the many parties to take shootings at Facebook’s role in spreading fake news.
But according to a new New York Times Magazine article published online on Tuesday, Obama didn’t merely complaints about fake bulletin, he also spoke directly to Mark Zuckerberg it.
In the article, entitled ” Can Facebook Fix Its Own Worst Bug, ” writer Farhad Manjoo probed Facebook’s efforts to adapt to and fix their own problems of fake bulletin on social media. While interviewing Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg for the narration, Manjoo asked if he had was talking about Obama about the former president’s grievances. And in agreement with the New York Times Magazine , “Zuckerberg paused for several seconds, virtually to the point of awkwardness, before answering that he had.”
Even Zuck knows things are bad if the former chairman of the United States presents pertain for his platform’s persona in government history.
“Zuckerberg paused for several seconds, virtually to the point of awkwardness, before answering that he had.”
Then, Facebooks spokespeople reportedly to be implemented after Manjoo’s interview was over, stressing that Obama was just one of countless parties Zuckerberg spoke with about the issue of fake bulletin in Facebook’s News Feed, to limit government assumptions about Facebook’s efforts to address fake news
While the conversation may have been awkward for Zuckerberg, the topic is not new to Obama.
Nearly a week and a half after the election, while speaking at a news conference in Berlin, President Obama publicly addressed the spread of fake bulletin, exclusively calling out Facebook.
“In an senility where theres so much active misinformation and it’s boxed very well and it inspects the same when you see it on a Facebook page or you turn on your video, if everything seems to be the same and no discriminations are made, then we wont know what to protect, ” he said.
“If we are not serious about realities and whats genuine and whats not, and particularly in an age of social media when so many parties are coming their info in sound bite and off their phones, ” he went on, “if we cant discriminate between serious contentions and hype, then we have problems.”
Following the election, Zuckerberg was first reluctant to admit that counterfeit news articles on Facebook had any sort of influence on the results. Eventually, he published a post on his Facebook page in November saying it was “extremely unlikely[ that] hoaxes changed the outcome of such elections in one attitude or the other.”
In that same berth, Zuckerberg also acknowledged that Facebook could do more to engagement fake bulletin, but downplayed the presence of misinformation on the place in the process.
“Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99% of what parties see is authentic. Exclusively a very small amount is fake bulletin and hoaxes, ” he wrote.
Since then, the company has taken active steps to fight the spread of misinformative clauses, including banning fake bulletin locates from its ad network and creating a tool at the opening of the News Feeds that offers tips on how to identify confusing information materials and links to helpful resources in the platform.
As for the future of Facebook, in a 6, 000 -word record entitled “Building Global Community”Zuckerberg communicated he strives to see a “supportive, ” “safe, ” “informed, ” “civically-engaged, ” and “inclusive” digital world.
Whatever changes Zuckerberg decides to realise to the pulpit in the future, he should remember Obama is taking note.